Houston Tax Attorney
Can the IRS withhold or set off a penalty refund owing to a taxpayer if the taxpayer has already recovered the amount in excess of the penalty from its tax attorney for malpractice? The court considered this in Ervin v. United States, No. 4:13-CV-00127-JHM (W.D. Ky. 2017).
Facts & Procedural History
Ervin participated in a tax shelter was promoted by its tax attorney. The IRS discovered and challenged the position and ultimately imposed the valuation misstatement penalty. Ervin sued his tax attorney and received a sizeable settlement.
In addition, Ervin filed a refund claim for, paid, and litigated the penalty. The jury determined that Ervin qualified for reasonable cause for the penalty, presumably based on reliance on a tax attorney, and that no penalty was due. The government refused to refund the amount Ervin paid for the penalty. Litigation ensued.
When a Refund is a Double Recovery
The court had to answer the question as to whether the IRS could keep a tax refund that a jury had determined was due and owing to the taxpayer based on the idea that the taxpayer had already received compensation in excess of the penalty.
The IRS made this very argument, that it did not have to refund Ervin’s penalty payment as “a refund will result in a windfall and double recovery since the Plaintiffs have already received a large settlement from their tax attorneys.”
An affirmative answer would make pursuing tax refund claims in court somewhat meaningless if they could be disregarded by the government. It would also raise the question as to whether taxpayers could simply ignore the jury’s findings. Naturally, the answer is that the jury’s findings cannot be ignored.
IRS Must Pay Refunds that Are Due
The court did not have to spend a lot of time writing its opinion in this case. It noted that the government did not cite “a single instance in which a court has excused the government’s obligation to repay the improperly assessed and collected tax in a refund suit.” It simply noted that the tax refund was due and the government had to pay it to the taxpayer.
So the answer to the question in the case is, “no,” the government cannot keep a tax refund that it was ordered to pay back to a taxpayer, even though the taxpayer had already received an award in excess of the penalty amount from its tax attorney.Previous post: U.S. Foreign Tax Credit Not Impacted by Repayment of Foreign Tax Refund
Next post: Duty of Consistency Applies to Different Types of Tax Returns