Serial IRS Whistleblower Cannot Remain Anonymous

Serial Irs Whistleblower Cannot Remain Anonymous

You would think that an IRS whistleblower could always remain anonymous. That is a fundamental feature of the whistleblower program. In Whistleblower 14377-16W v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. 25, the U.S. Tax Court concluded that a whistleblower claimant could not remain anonymous when litigating his claim in court. This case is one all whistleblowers should read…

Issue for the New Partnership Audit Procedures Raised in TEFRA Case

Tax Law Is Not Determined By Common Industry Term

The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) procedures were intended to make it easier for the IRS to audit partnership tax returns. TEFRA failed to deliver. The rules are nuanced and hard to apply. The new partnership audit procedures are intended to remedy this. With the new partnership IRS audit procedures coming…

Penalty Abatement for Reliance on Tax Advisor Who Made Obvious Errors

Penalty Abatement For Reliance On Tax Advisor Who Made Obvious Errors

The IRS often willing to abate or remove tax penalties. To do so, taxpayers usually have to show that they acted with reasonable cause and in good faith. Relying on a competent tax professional can be one way taxpayers can make this showing. But what exactly is a competent tax professional? The court addressed this…

Wholly Owned Corp and Parent Not the “Same Corporation” for Interest Netting

Wholly Owned Corp And Parent Not The “same Corporation” For Interest Netting

In Ford Motor Co. v. United States, No. 14-458T (Ct. Cl. 2017), the court addressed whether a wholly owned corporation and its parent were the “same corporation” when computing the amount of interest the taxpayer owed to the IRS. This “same corporation” issue is one that comes up in most interest-netting cases. The Interest Netting…

Two Years to File Refund Suit in District Court, Six Years in Federal Court of Claims

Two Years To File Refund Suit In District Court, Six Years In Federal Court Of Claims

If the IRS owes the taxpayer a refund, the general rule is that the taxpayer has to file a refund claim with the IRS, wait for the IRS to disallow the claim, and then, within two years of the date the claim is disallowed, file suit to recoup the refund. This is the general rule.…

Do You Have to Use the IRS’s Official Forms?

Do You Have To Use The Irs’s Official Forms?

Do taxpayers have to use the official forms published by the IRS?  In May v. United States, No. 15-16599 (9th Cir. 2017), the court considered whether a taxpayer is subject to the listed transaction penalty if he fails to file the IRS’s reportable transaction form, but the IRS is otherwise furnished with all of the information…

Duty of Consistency for Different Types of Tax Returns

Duty Of Consistency Applies To Different Types Of Tax Returns

Taxpayers have to report tax positions consistently from year to year.  They cannot get a tax benefit from taking inconsistent positions.  The duty of consistency doctrine provides for this.  But does this doctrine require items to be reported consistently on different types of tax returns?  The court addressed this in Musa v. Commissioner, No. 16-1841 (7th…

IRS Must Refund Penalties Despite Tax Malpractice Recovery

Irs Must Refund Penalties Despite Tax Malpractice Recovery

Can the IRS withhold or set off a penalty refund owing to a taxpayer if the taxpayer has already recovered the amount in excess of the penalty from its tax attorney for malpractice?  The court considered this in Ervin v. United States, No. 4:13-CV-00127-JHM (W.D. Ky. 2017). Facts & Procedural History Ervin participated in a tax shelter…

U.S. Foreign Tax Credit Not Impacted by Repayment of Foreign Tax Refund

U.s. Foreign Tax Credit Not Impacted By Repayment Of Foreign Tax Refund

The tax assessment and collection process in most foreign countries is markedly different than the process in the U.S. These differences can present a number of challenges for U.S. citizens who reside in foreign countries. In Sotiropoulos v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2017-75, the court considered one of these challenges, namely, how does one determine whether…

Reckless Conduct Sufficient for FBAR Civil Tax Penalty

Subchapter S Corporation Losses Limited By Tax Basis

It is not clear as to what level of conduct justifies the imposition of the $100,000+ foreign bank account reporting (“FBAR”) civil tax penalty. In Bedrosian v. United States, No. 15-5853 (E.D. Pa. 2017), the court considered whether reckless conduct is sufficient given the facts presented in the case. The FBAR Civil Tax Penalty The…